A Guide to Ground Lease Investing

A ground lease, also a land lease, is an arrangement where a landlord (lessor) grants a tenant the right to use and develop a piece of land for an agreed period, usually 50-99 years. Ground leases can either be unsubordinated, where the landlord has primary control over the property, or subordinated, where the landlord agrees to give up property rights to a lender if the tenant defaults on the loan used to build on the land. Investors can consider several factors to make informed investment decisions about ground leases.

Assessing future plans is a crucial step for investors considering ground leases. While ground leases can provide access to desirable locations without purchasing land, weighing the potential drawbacks is important. One significant consideration is the lock-in period, which can limit an investor’s flexibility to adapt to changing business needs. For instance, an investor looking to upscale their business may find relocating challenging until the lock-in period expires.

Investing in ground leases also requires careful consideration of zoning regulations. With a ground lease lasting between 50-99 years, investors should ensure their development plans align with the land’s zoning regulations. Failure to do so could result in a lengthy wait for zoning approvals if the land was not zoned for what investors plan to use it for. Reviewing the ground lease agreement is also vital to ensure it includes provisions for potential zoning changes in the future that can affect the property’s value.

Additionally, investors should focus on existing ground leases rather than new ones. New ground leases (created for the first time, usually because of a new development project) can attract high land rents. In contrast, old ground leases (already in place) can come at a discount, potentially providing investors with higher returns on investment. Moreover, investors should be cautious of ground leases with big, fixed ground rent increases, which may force them to pass the cost to tenants on their properties.

Having a plan and an end-game as an investor when entering a ground lease agreement is crucial to ensure a successful investment. This is because ground leases are similar to an amortizing loan (a loan with a fixed payment schedule that includes both principal and interest), such that the lessee (investor) is making a loan to themselves. They must get all their full capital back plus the profit over the lease period.

However, the most complex part of entering into a ground lease agreement as an investor is negotiating the key terms and ensuring they are fair and satisfactory. Key agreement terms can include rent payment structure, options to renew or terminаte the lease, restrictions on property use, and the length of the lease. Regarding the length, for instance, settling for a shorter term may provide more flexibility, while a longer one may offer more certainty and stability for both parties.

Another aspect investors should consider is obtaining finance for any planned developments on the leased ground. However, getting a financial institution to finance the developments can be difficult since the borrower does not own the land and cannot grant a lien (i.e., legal claim on a property for unpaid debt) against it. To work around this challenge, investors seeking financing may consider entering into a subordinated ground lease agreement, which grants them top priority and acts as security for the lender should the borrower default.

from WordPress https://ift.tt/oSscqbn
via IFTTT

Understanding the Basics of Ground Lease Bifurcation

Ground lease bifurcation refers to the separation of ownership rights between the land and its improvements. In other words, it involves dividing a piece of land into two separate parts, with one owner owning the land (the ground lessor) and another owning the buildings and other structures on the land (the ground lessee).

The concept of ground lease bifurcation has been around for many years, but it has gained prominence recently due to changes in the real estate market and the economy. One of the main reasons for this trend is the increasing value of land, which makes it more expensive for developers to acquire and own land entirely. By splitting the land ownership and the buildings, developers can reduce their initial capital outlay and spread their investment over a more extended period.

The basic structure of a ground lease varies. However, the crucial elements of the lease usually encompass the rental rate, duration, and reset provisions.

Lease bifurcation involves the creation of two separate agreements. The first agreement is the ground lease, which gives the ground lessee the right to use and occupy the land for a specified period (usually several decades). The ground lessee pays rent to the ground lessor, who retains land ownership. The second agreement is the building lease, which gives the ground lessee the right to own and develop the buildings and other structures on the land.

Ground lease bifurcation can offer several benefits for ground lessors and ground lessees. For ground lessors, it provides a steady stream of income over a long period as they continue to own the land and collect rent from the ground lessee. Ground lease income is typically more secure than traditional rental income, as the ground lease is usually extended and is often tied to the underlying land value.

Additionally, ground lease bifurcation can allow ground lessors to retain ownership of their land while allowing others to develop it. Taking this approach helps to ensure that the land is used in a way that aligns with their long-term goals and Vision.

For ground lessees, one of the main advantages is the ability to reduce upfront capital costs. Ground lessee does not need to purchase the land outright. Instead, they can focus their investment on developing the buildings and other structures on the land. Ground lease bifurcation can also offer greater flexibility in financing and development options. Ground lessees can often obtain more favorable financing terms for their buildings than they could if they owned the land outright. Additionally, ground lease bifurcation can provide ground lessees with a long-term leasehold interest that can be used as collateral for additional financing.

Recent trends and analysis suggest that ground lease bifurcation is becoming more popular in some regions of the real estate market. For example, ground lease bifurcation is typical in urban areas with high land values, and developers are looking for ways to reduce their upfront costs. It is also becoming more popular in the hospitality industry, where hotels and resorts are often built on leased land. Ground lease bifurcation is also used in the retail sector, where ground leases are used to reduce the cost of developing shopping centers and other retail properties.

from WordPress https://ift.tt/sPebIvp
via IFTTT

An Overview of Sequenced Construction

Construction projects are generally easy to complete when a building is vacant. In some cases, however, maintaining partial occupancy is necessary or desirable as construction continues. In other cases, occupying a building as each section or floor is completed makes financial sense. Sequenced construction is a good option in these instances as it helps avoid disruptions while allowing work to continue.

Commercial building renovations or additions can take several months to complete, which creates work disruptions besides operational inefficiencies. Construction sequencing, also known as construction scheduling, allows certain building sections, floors, or specific areas to be completed and occupied as the construction work progresses.

With sequenced construction, the work can be planned in phases or stages rather than as one nonstop process. For example, the foundation of an entire building can be laid, and then one wing can be constructed, completed, and occupied before work commences on the other wings or sections.

Once the first phase is executed and is perhaps running profitably, it opens the door for the second or subsequent phase. Many developers only embark on the next phase after the execution first one is fully functioning so that its revenue can fund later stages of the project. However, phased construction overlap can still occur in some built systems, such as sewerage and drainage connections.

For property developers, a key advantage of the construction schedule is that they don’t have to pay for the entire building or renovation project upfront. The developer only seeks financing for the work to be done immediately as the project is done in stages or phases, reducing the overall immediate financial burden.

Construction scheduling has important implications for the entire budgeting process, as a single phase impact other stages of the project. The finance manager must analyze the cash flow needs of each phase when selecting which projects get priority. Project phasing can also help maintain a healthy cash flow as lower initial capital injections are required compared to funding the entire construction project at once.

When executed well, construction sequencing requires limited time for the developer to design the plan and coordinate the work as it may involve fewer workers and less time. This can, therefore, be a low-cost construction strategy in terms of funding and human resources.

The main drawback of sequenced construction is that the project may take longer because work is done in phases. In the long run, the scope of work might change, making the project complex to implement. Also, construction scheduling may lead to the need to acquire separate permits from local building authorities, thus increasing operational inefficiencies.

However, project scheduling or sequencing may be a good option in many situations. For example, when renovating or expanding a law enforcement center, it’s untenable to displace an entire police force and support workers. Working in separate facility areas at different times may help maintain critical law enforcement operations without jeopardizing the safety of the community, officers, and inmates at risk.

Another example is a sports stadium. Construction can repair or install a new turf off-season. Alternatively, stadium repair work can begin on a section of terraces and still allow a limited number of sports fans to watch the activities on the pitch from one side of the field.

from WordPress https://ift.tt/YSKOA47
via IFTTT

Formula 1's Sustainable Development Strategies

 As the world grapples with the effects of climate change and the impact of human activity, international racing class. Formula 1 has taken a hard look at its environmental footprint. Formula 1 is responsible for at least 250,000 tons of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere each season.

With this in mind, Formula 1 has taken steps to reduce its environmental impact. As part of its sustainability strategy, Formula 1 plans to be net zero carbon by 2030. Formula 1 invests approximately $1 billion annually in sustainable research and development.

One of the areas in which Formula 1 has sought to improve its sustainability is fuel consumption. In the past, Formula 1 cars used engines that consumed a significant amount of fuel, leading to concerns over carbon emissions and air pollution. In recent years, Formula 1 has introduced new regulations that require cars to use hybrid engines, which combine a traditional internal combustion engine with an electric motor. These hybrid engines are more fuel-efficient and emit less carbon while continuing to maximize output, making them a more sustainable option.

Another area in which Formula 1 has sought to improve its sustainability is through alternative fuels. In recent years, Formula 1 has explored the use of biofuels made from renewable sources, such as corn or vegetable oil. Biofuels emit less carbon than traditional fossil fuels, making them more sustainable options. Formula 1 has also experimented with synthetic fuels, which are produced using renewable energy sources and can potentially further reduce carbon emissions. By 2025, new engine regulations are expected to be introduced, and cars will entirely run on sustainable fuels.

In addition to these measures, Formula 1 has sought to reduce its environmental impact through changes to its logistics and operations. According to a Formula 1 official report, the biggest contributor to carbon emissions is logistics and travel, amounting to 72 percent of all CO2 emissions (45 percent belonging to air, sea, and road transport logistically required to be put on each race, and 27 percent belonging to the transport of all personnel, promoters, and partners).

Formula 1 has introduced new regulations to reduce waste and improve the sustainability of its supply chain. Formula 1 has also launched a sustainability program to reduce its carbon footprint and promote sustainable practices.

Formula 1 is also considering the electrification of cars. However, it is cautious of investing too many resources because electric cars require power still derived from fossil-fuelled power stations. For now, electric vehicles are not the main solution for reducing transport carbon emissions.

Formula 1 has recognized its role in promoting sustainable practices and has launched initiatives to raise awareness of environmental issues and encourage fans to adopt more sustainable behaviors. These initiatives include sustainable materials in constructing cars and race tracks, promoting sustainable transportation options, and introducing green energy solutions at events.

While there is still work to be done to improve the sustainability of Formula 1, the sport has made significant progress. By embracing new technologies, exploring alternative fuels, and promoting sustainable practices, Formula 1 is working to reduce its environmental impact and promote a more sustainable future.